10:02 AM Thursday July 28,
2016
Pondering the basis of elitism...
Here I am…looking at Plato's Republic…a summary at Wikipedia…thought flashes through me:
Here I am…looking at Plato's Republic…a summary at Wikipedia…thought flashes through me:
Real problem is the
gradual taking over of the human psyche by the left-brain, the speech center,
the attempt to further conscious control…
Emergence of what we
call consciousness. This consciousness is dominated by the language center and
is different than the consciousness created by the pictogram cultures that use
hieroglyphics to send messages. Pictogram cultures, eg Chinese, use images rather than a phonetic-based writing system. That's why we read left-to-right, activating the Broca speech center in the left-brain, while they can go in either direction. Pictograms activate the right-brain....and more on that later.
So pre-Socratic
culture is the culture of people who can still find the center of the
psyche outside of their ego. By the time Socrates comes along, the elite, who
need to be in control and understand what they do, have become obsessed with
delineating the meaning of various concepts such as justice, which has a basis in what is strongly felt, in our experience. So, our experience is at the basis of the concept...not pure ideation...and this is not to say that our experience is never
distorted or merely subjective.
Socrates and Plato abandon the tragedies...all evil comes from an imperfection in understanding or conduct that is our human "error" ...a lack of good ("privatio boni")...not inherent in the system...because that would make God responsible for evil.
By the way, reading Plato, you might think that basically every dinner party in ancient Greece with the elite was a kind of ancient "Charlie Rose Show"....
Socrates and Plato abandon the tragedies...all evil comes from an imperfection in understanding or conduct that is our human "error" ...a lack of good ("privatio boni")...not inherent in the system...because that would make God responsible for evil.
By the way, reading Plato, you might think that basically every dinner party in ancient Greece with the elite was a kind of ancient "Charlie Rose Show"....
What the people who
are advocates of a certain type of consciousness want are definitions so that
they can argue their case concerning their activities and programs in
relationship to values. It represents the emergence of a lawyer-like attitude that we begin to be find almost everywhere in the West after the Renaissance and find nearly everywhere in the world today.
In a sense it is the left-brain "mind" taking over for the "gods"...those impulses from within that were considered to come from "on high"...through (in Latin), the "Rex" (king), whose name is the source of the word "reason"...the "rays" of light...or from a very feminine Pythia or female seer who told us what the "Mother" wanted...
In a sense it is the left-brain "mind" taking over for the "gods"...those impulses from within that were considered to come from "on high"...through (in Latin), the "Rex" (king), whose name is the source of the word "reason"...the "rays" of light...or from a very feminine Pythia or female seer who told us what the "Mother" wanted...
This elevation of
consciousness (in the word-driven version of it) is part of the mind-body split.
It might explain why Apollo killed the
lover of his sister.
Apollo killed the
lover of his sister because the lover represented a threat to his ownership of the
knowledge. Apollo protected the Pythia, the woman who was the oracle at Delphi
in Greece.
By the way, the oracle was usually an uneducated shepherd girl...ah..yes..very little left-brain there to interfere with the process of going back into the unconscious through the right-brain, the real "interpretation expert", the "Eve"....more on that later. (Mostly a note for myself right now.)
By the way, the oracle was usually an uneducated shepherd girl...ah..yes..very little left-brain there to interfere with the process of going back into the unconscious through the right-brain, the real "interpretation expert", the "Eve"....more on that later. (Mostly a note for myself right now.)
Socrates and people
like Socrates shift to the anti-tragic worldview because, as they become
conscious, they begin to judge God by the same concept processes that they use
to judge themselves. And with that, begins a long process of making God not
responsible for the evil of the world. That continued for literally 1300 years
until 17th-century philosophy and especially 19th-century philosophy question
the existence of God or question the way he operates.
What's done to people through process of
shaming is that a kind of Berlin wall is set up between the conscious mind and
the unconscious mind. I like to compare it to the scene in the film "The Emerald
Forest" where the Brazilian native people come to the edge of the rainforest and
see construction of the dam going on. They call it "the edge of the
world".
I say that the
walling off of consciousness which began with the Socratic philosophers started
to come to an end, a real end, in the 19th century with Nietzsche and Jung who
began to distinguish that the unconscious is actually a vital and intelligent
force that we are in some sense loathe to acknowledge.
Freud essentially
deemed the unconscious mind as the unruly element of the psyche, the "Id". He never saw the
conscious mind as the source of our capacity to be so unruly and neurotic, as it were.
So between the
trauma and the fact that we are left only with this mapbook called the
conscious mind, our culture had to head
in a certain direction which has led us to all of our problems that we have
today.
Since the
unconscious mind and all of its relationship to the collective unconscious is
at once denied and cut off, then it follows that the leadership class is the
only one with the capacity to understand what needs to be done. I am reminded
of the scene in "Remains of the Day" in which the head of the estate puts his
head servant certain through hell, embarrassing him concerning his capacity to
participate in democracy, as if he had no mind.
Kilroy wasn't there in that scene, but Plato surely was....
Kilroy wasn't there in that scene, but Plato surely was....
Just had the flash that the head of the estate was essentially a
fascist as well, albeit a kinder gentler one, and that's why he couldn't
understand what he was looking at what he was looking at the Nazis.
But, the American (Christopher Reeve) did with his more pragmatic intelligence...
But, the American (Christopher Reeve) did with his more pragmatic intelligence...
If the servants have incomplete minds, then they will interpret their instructions incorrectly and
that can't be good. So, they must remain tabula rasa to the point of a virtual
complete self-extinguishment. It's been the modus operandi of various great institutions
from the Catholic Church to the Communist Party.
To be continued....
A pregnant statement that can be taken in multiple directions, this: "Since the unconscious mind and all of its relationship to the collective unconscious is at once denied and cut off, then it follows that the leadership class is the only one with the capacity to understand what needs to be done." If we look at what's going on today, post-2017, the collective unconscious has been unleashed as a 'lie & destroy' monster (a new coinage of mine) in every sphere of life -- sexual, social, politicql and cultural. The crucial question in this discourse thereby is: is it the leadership class, again, that did it? Was it their left-brain, conscious intention to manipulate the collective unconscious' dark, regressive side so as to be able to enslave animals, which is easier to accomplish in the 21st century than having to deal with citizens with inalienable human rights? Such is the nature of the quandeies inspired by this thought-provoking piece in my mind of 2022.
ReplyDelete